Gravity - Does it have an electric origin?

All objects are composed of atoms with a nucleus and a surrounding shell of electrons.  Atoms are attracted to each other when they are polarised.  Polarisation of atoms becomes apparent when they form themselves into a sphere like the earth or planet.  The spherical shape is the natural one throughout the universe. 

Why is Coulomb's law of electrostatic attraction similar to Newton's law of gravitational attraction?  Both are inverse square laws      

Many Dimensions? - Penrose is Wrong

What is a metamathematician? Well there is no such person, for a mathematician can DEFINE any number of dimensions that are mutually independent.  But the 'meta' or unreality came into the whole of modern physics when more than three dimensions were applied to space resulting in weird mathematics.   If one has any three mutually independent perpendicular dimensions one can define any point in space.  That is, and always has been, sufficient and real.  Modern physics went wrong when physicists became influenced by mathematicians introducing their unreal spaces of more than the three dimensional Cartesian space.  Thus when the mathematician Roger Penrose wrote his book The Road to Reality - A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, he was essentially writing popycock.  He was not writing about real physics, and this despite having theories that appear to explain some experimental results.  

What has been the outcome?  Physicists are ruled by the mathematician theorists to whom they bow.       

Black Hole - the Real Deal?

Do you believe that what you saw was a photograph of a black hole as portrayed by  scientists?  Or was there just too much mathematical processing of the results from a number of telescopes around the world to make the final result believable?  Even if the image was correct, it appears to me that the scientists have interpreted it as a black hole in accordance with their theoretical understanding.  That could be completely different from reality.      

Birmingham University's Black Holes

Yesterday, a picture was shown on BBC television supposedly of two 'black holes' merging.  This was a finding of some researchers at Birmingham University.   The average person might think they were looking at a real picture.  But they would be wrong.  The picture was a mathematical model imagined by the researchers.  That also applies to the other 'black holes' merging which the researchers say they have found.

In his book Stephen Hawking Smoked My Socks, South African astronomer Hilton Ratcliffe wrote (see page 273), quoting words written by Stephen Hawking in January 2014: "I take this as indicating that ... there would be no event horizons and no firewalls.  The absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes -- in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity."  Hawking had recanted.  Ratcliffe warns against metamathematicians (see page 262).  

Professor Lucie Green of UCL: 15 Million Degrees - A Journey to the Centre of the Sun

INTRODUCTION

The galaxies of the universe emit cosmic rays, providing energy sources to each other.  All the galaxies are dependent on each other for their energy supplies.  Is Mach's principle a clue to this energy dependency?  

All the stars in our galaxy emit cosmic rays which impinge on the sun's heliosphere and corona.  The cosmic ray gathering power of these two areas is immense.  The bulk of these cosmic rays are fast moving electrons which are accelerated to high speeds by electric fields existing between stars.  The moving electrons are in plasmas and produce magnetic fields which interact with or are superimposed on, for example, the sun's magnetic field. 

The effects that we observe in and around the sun are caused by the movement of the sun through our galaxy, and not to any activity originating within the sun itself.   Why do we have galaxies if they are not jointly self-sustaining? 

Could the sun have a magnetic field at its centre if the core wasn't cool, and thus not at a temperature of 15 million degrees?  Is the centre of the sun solid or liquid?  

Why is the sun hotter in the corona (a plasma at a few million degrees Kelvin and 3000km above the photosphere) than the photosphere (a plasma at a few thousand degrees Kelvin) at the surface?

L. Green: "At the heart of the sun a gigantic nuclear furnace provides a continual source of energy that we would love to be able to emulate here on earth."  Is this pure speculation? 
Have we falsely applied nuclear fusion experiments on earth to the stars?  Are the scientists on a wild goose energy chase?